论文部分内容阅读
目的对喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在婴幼儿麻醉中应用的探讨和研究。方法 80例患儿,按照不同插管方式分为实验组与对照组,各40例。实验组采用喉罩麻醉,对照组采用气管插管麻醉,观察两组患儿中心静脉压、心率、术后苏醒时间以及术后并发症发生率,对比出更适合婴幼儿麻醉的插管方式。结果给予喉罩麻醉的患儿拔管时间、术后并发症均少于气管插管组,血流动力学指标更为平稳,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论喉罩麻醉相比气管插管麻醉,其具有血流动力学稳定、苏醒快、术后并发症少等优点,更适合婴幼儿麻醉。
Objective To study the application of laryngeal mask anesthesia and tracheal intubation anesthesia in infant anesthesia. Methods 80 cases of children, divided into experimental group and control group according to different intubation methods, each 40 cases. The experimental group was treated with laryngeal mask anesthesia, and the control group was anesthetized by tracheal intubation. The central venous pressure, heart rate, postoperative recovery time and the incidence of postoperative complications were observed in two groups, and the intubation more suitable for infant anesthesia was compared. Results Laryngeal anesthesia in children with laryngeal anesthesia extubation time, postoperative complications were less than the endotracheal intubation group, hemodynamic parameters were more stable, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Laryngeal anesthesia compared to intubation anesthesia, which has hemodynamic stability, rapid recovery, less postoperative complications, etc., is more suitable for infant anesthesia.