论文部分内容阅读
我在「人民教育」一九五三年六月號上,以問題解答方式發表過「新民主主義教育和社會主義教育有無性質上的差別」一文,那時中央還沒有公佈過渡時期的總路線,僅就理論範圍討論了兩者的一致和差別。此後,又在「人民教育」一九五四年四月號上,發表了「新民主主義教育和社會主義教育的關係」一文,它的內容僅限於標題規定的範圍,都不是像柳維光同志說的「兩篇文章有一個共同目的,想要解決過渡時期教育的性質問題」(見「人民教育」一九五四年六月號,下同)。在第二篇文章中還提到寫第一篇文章時對問題「認識不足」,
In my article entitled “People’s Education”, June 1935, I published a question-and-answer essay titled “Are there any differences in nature between new-democratic education and socialist education?” At that time, the Central Government had still not announced the general line for the transition period, The agreement and difference between the two are discussed only on the theoretical scale. Since then, on the April 1954 issue of “People’s Education,” a paper entitled “The Relationship Between New Democratic Education and Socialist Education” has been published. Its contents are limited to the scope of the title, and not to the words of Comrade Liu Weiguang “The two essays share a common purpose and want to address the nature of transitional education” (see “People’s Education”, June 1954, the same below). In the second article, I also mentioned that when I wrote the first essay, I did not know enough about the problem.