论文部分内容阅读
目的通过比较改良式采血方式和传统采血方式用于新生儿疾病筛查的效果,探讨新生儿足底采血的优势方法。方法在本院出生的满72h的新生儿200例,随机分为实验组(A组)和对照组(B组),每组100例,分别用两种不同的方式采足底血,观察两组的一次采血成功率、采血时间、及足跟红肿发生率。结果实验组在一次采血成功率、采血时间、针刺深度、红肿发生率方面明显优于对照组。结论斜刺足底采血方式明显优于传统采血方法 ,值得推广。
Objective To compare the effect of modified blood sampling method and traditional blood sampling method on neonatal disease screening and to explore the advantages of neonatal plantar blood sampling. Methods 200 neonates born at 72h in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group (group A) and control group (group B), with 100 cases in each group. Blood was collected from two groups in two different ways, Group a success rate of blood collection, blood collection time, and the incidence of heel swelling. Results The experimental group was significantly better than the control group in the success rate of blood collection, blood collection time, depth of acupuncture and the incidence of swelling. Conclusion Oblique pricking method is superior to the traditional method of collecting blood and is worth popularizing.