论文部分内容阅读
最近有人对新发现的朱熹佚文作了辨伪,(载《古籍整理研究学刊》1992年第6期)其认真对待佚文的态度,精神可嘉!不过该文对1年来所发现的朱熹佚文几乎都作了否定,则笔者不敢苟同。笔者曾写有《朱熹在瀛山书院讲演及其佚文墨宝考》)载《中国哲学史研究》1988年第4期),和《朱熹佚文四篇散论》(载《朱子学刊》总第5期),对部分朱熹佚文的发现及其意义作了考辨与论述。其中可能疏误不周之处,但从总体上说,笔者仍然坚持原来的看法,肯定我的考辨和论述过的佚文的真实性,兹再补充申述,并旁及其他佚文,辨正如下。
Recently, some people have made a false discovery of the newly discovered Zhu Xi lost article (“The Collection of Ancient Books Research,” No. 6, 1992), which takes seriously the attitude of the lost article. However, Almost all made a negative, then I do not agree. The author has written “Zhu Xi Yue Ying College Lecture and Lost Text Calligraphy”) contained “the history of Chinese philosophy,” 1988 the fourth period), and “Zhu Xi Lost article four scattered theory” (contained in “Journal” fifth Period), the author discovers and discusses the discovery and significance of some of Zhu Xi’s lost essays. There may be misunderstandings here, but on the whole, the author still upholds the original view and affirms the authenticity of the texts that I have examined and discussed. I will add the representations next to other lost articles as follows.