论文部分内容阅读
在光绪年间所修的浙江、江苏两地的两部蒋氏族谱中,出现了署名王羲之的谱序和传文,但是谱序中记载,在永和十年兰亭修禊之时有蒋家的人向他求序,而求序人的姓名在两篇序文中都不一样,这说明曾经有两批求序者,或者在这一年里有过两次修禊活动,显然是不能成立的。传文中所提到的蒋奕史书里没有任何记载,西晋时期的冠军将军和会稽、吴兴都督也与他无关,可见这些事迹甚至蒋奕这个人都是杜撰的。因此,这几篇署名王羲之的文章,其实都是伪托之作。我们使用族谱资料时,特别是对待其中有关历史名人的资料时,一定要格外谨慎,不可盲从。
During the reign of Emperor Guangxu in Zhejiang and Jiangsu, two Jiang’s genealogies appeared in the spectrum of the signature of Wang Xizhi and his essay, but the records in the spectrum showed that during the ten years of Lanting, Ordering him, and the name of the person seeking the order is different in both prefaces. This shows that there were obviously two unsettled establishments in the past when there were two batches of preemptives or two rounds of repatriation activities in the year. Biography of Jiang Yi mentioned in the biography does not have any records, the championship in the Western Jin Dynasty and Hueiji, Governor Wu Xing has nothing to do with him, we can see these deeds even Jiang Yi this person is fabricated. Therefore, these articles signed by Wang Xizhi, in fact, are made as a fake care. When we use genealogical information, especially when dealing with the information about historical celebrities, we must be very cautious and not blind.