论文部分内容阅读
本文试图从一个经济运行中的微观环节──交易的角度确立经济法调整对象的范围和其内在合理性。本文认为，交易可分为具单一影响的交易和具双重影响的交易。所谓双重影响，是指除对交易当事人产生影响外，还对非交易当事人产生影响，后者即通常所谓的外部性。单一影响则指只对交易当事人产生影响。复合调整模式下两种不同的规范 (即通常所谓调整横向和纵向经济关系的规范 )的共同功能是消除外部性。因此，我们认为，复合调整模式下的不同法律规范具有内在的功能统一性，即消除外部性。体现国家干预和具有内在的功能统一性可以把调整纵向经济关系与调整横向经济关系的法律规范整合起来。本文另外还指出了调整横向经济关系的法律规范的特性──体现国家干预与强行法的特性，进一步支持了“纵横统一论”。
This article attempts to establish the scope and internal rationality of the object of economic law adjustment from the perspective of a transaction at a microscopic level in economic operation. This paper argues that transactions can be divided into single-impact transactions and double-impact transactions. The so-called double impact, in addition to the transaction parties have an impact, but also non-transaction parties have an impact, which is usually the so-called externalities. A single impact means only the parties to the transaction have an impact. The common function of the two different specifications in the composite adjustment model, the so-called specification of adjusting horizontal and vertical economic relations, is the elimination of externalities. Therefore, we think that the different legal norms under the compound adjustment mode have the inherent functional unity, that is, the elimination of externalities. Embodying state intervention and having inherent functional unity can integrate the legal norms of adjusting vertical economic relations with the adjustment of horizontal economic relations. In addition, this article also points out the characteristics of the law and regulation that adjust the horizontal economic relations ─ ─ embodies the characteristics of state intervention and jus cogens and further supports the “unity of aspect and aspect.”