论文部分内容阅读
自从上世纪七十年代扬州出土了唐青花瓷片以来,唐青花就成为古陶瓷界热议的话题。本刊于2009年第4期发表了张志刚、张浦生二位先生联合撰写的《浅说唐代青花瓷科技鉴定》后,同样引起了广大读者的关注,也有一些陶瓷界的科技工作者对该文的一些观点提出质疑。本文作者张福平先生曾供职于中国轻工业陶瓷研究所,他根据文中提供的检测数据,提出“唐青花不是釉下彩”的观点。本刊一贯提倡争鸣,特将此文发表,以供读者参考。
Since the seventies of last century, Yangzhou unearthed Tang blue and white porcelain, Tang blue and white porcelain became the hot topic in the ancient ceramics industry. This issue in 2009 No. 4 published Zhang Zhigang, Zhang Pusheng two gentlemen jointly wrote the “shallow Tang porcelain identification of blue and white porcelain,” the same attracted the attention of the majority of readers, there are some ceramic industry scientists on the article some Point of view questioned. Mr. Zhang Fuping, the author of this paper, once worked for China National Light Industry Ceramics Institute. According to the test data provided by the article, he put forward the idea that “Tang blue flowers are not underglaze”. The magazine has always advocated contention, especially the article published for readers reference.