论文部分内容阅读
以传统主义者著称的伽达默尔实际上反叛着两种传统:其一是对方法论诠释学崇尚的“作者中心论”传统的反叛,由此走向了“读者中心论”;其二是对近现代科学的知识论传统的反叛,拒斥其在人文社会科学领域无限扩张的普遍性要求。但伽达默尔并没有简单否定上述两种传统对方法论的追求,而是在倡导本体论诠释学的同时,潜含着一种走向生存论意义的方法论的努力,其特点是从本体论的基点上来建构诠释学的方法论。在理解问题上,从科学认识论模式转换到实践哲学模式,是伽达默尔走向生存论意义的方法论的关键所在。
Gadamer, known as a traditionalist, actually rebels against two traditions: one is the “author-centered theory” of “methodological hermeneutics” and the “traditional rebellion” leading to “reader-centered theory.” The second is the rebellion against the traditional epistemology of modern science, rejecting the universal requirement of its unlimited expansion in the humanities and social sciences. However, Gadamer did not simply deny the two traditional pursuit of methodology, but advocated ontological hermeneutics at the same time, implied a kind of approach to the survival of the significance of the theory of endeavor, which is characterized from the ontology Basis Point to Construct Hermeneutics Methodology. In understanding, the transformation from scientific epistemology to practical philosophical mode is the key to Gadamer’s methodological approach to existentialism.