论文部分内容阅读
2006年的两会传出消息《,物权法》列入今年立法计划,草案待条件成熟时再提请审议。至此,过去一年关于《物权法(草案)》正反两派的白热化争论似乎有了一个“结局”。但当我们静下心来梳理这场已历时半年多的大论战,透过双方泛政治性的“指控”,我们能够看到,《草案》引发的激烈争吵,只是近年来建立在不同利益群体矛盾日益激化的一个表现,是不断升温的“改革成败”争论的一部分。如何使改革开放以来所形成的不同利益群体和谐相处,而不是草率从事,使这些矛盾和冲突更加表面化和激化,恰恰是通过立法所应该达到的目的。
Two news reports released in 2006, “Property Law” included in this year's legislative plan, the draft to be reviewed when the conditions are ripe. At this point, the heated debate over the pros and cons of the “Property Law (Draft)” in the past year seems to have had an “ending.” However, when we calm down and sort out the great debate that has lasted for more than six months, we can see through the “accusations” of pan-political parties that both parties are draconian that the drastic bickering triggered by the “draft” has only been established in recent years in the conflicts of different interest groups An increasingly intensified manifestation is part of the heated debate over the success or failure of the reform. How to make the different interest groups formed since the reform and opening up get along harmoniously instead of sloppy so as to make these conflicts and conflicts more superficial and intensified is exactly the goal that should be achieved through legislation.