论文部分内容阅读
“逼封万岁说”是解释1856年天京事变近因的一种比较流行的观点。它包含着两个直接的结论:一是杨秀清逼洪秀全封他为万岁是图谋篡位,取洪秀全而代之;二是洪秀全受杨秀清之逼从而明确感受到杨秀清对他最高统治地位的威胁又绝不想被取代。从现有史料看,封万岁事当无疑问,关键在是否为逼封。对此,各种史料记述颇有出入,多系传闻,有许多自相矛盾处。本文拟从太平天国前期主要领导人封号称呼的特征以及洪秀全的思想意识特征对“逼封万岁说”作一点考察,我认为,历史上并无杨秀清逼封万岁之事。
“Long live” is a more popular view explaining the reason of the Tian-Wu incident in 1856. It contains two direct conclusions: First, Yang Xiuqing forced Hong Xiuquan Feng, his long livelihood is to usurp the throne, taking Hong Xiuquan replaced; Second, Hong Xiuquan forced by Yang Xiuqing in order to clearly feel the threat of Yang Xiuqing to his supreme dominance and never want Be replaced. From the existing historical data, Feng Long live undoubtedly, the key is whether forcing seal. In this regard, quite a variety of historical records differ, mostly rumors, there are many contradictory. This article intends to make a point of inspection from the characteristics of title titles of leading leaders in the early days of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom and Hong Xiuquan’s ideological characteristics.