论文部分内容阅读
“恶债”理论角度的分析表明,联合国贸易和发展会议《负责任的主权借贷行为原则》(下称“原则”)的创举在于从程序角度规定贷款人在主权贷款中的尽职调查、主权债务重组责任,并对“恶债”的界定和“恶债”理论的适用有所发展。“原则”具有一定的国内法基础,可能会成为主权债务国履行偿债义务的抗辩理由和贷款人竞争的手段。作为新兴债权大国,我国有必要拓宽“原则”的关注视角,主张规范主权债券发行市场并在主权债务合同、对外发展援助机制和多边层面作出相应的安排。
The analysis of the theory of “bad debt” shows that the initiative of “UNCTAD Principles of Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing” (hereinafter referred to as “principle ”) lies in the procedural regulation of the lender’s due diligence in the sovereign loan Investigation, the responsibility of sovereign debt restructuring, and the development of the definition of “bad debt” and the application of “bad debt” theory. “Principle ” has a certain foundation of domestic law and may become a defense of sovereign debtor countries in performing their debt service obligations and a means of competition for lenders. As a big emerging country of creditor’s rights, it is necessary for our country to broaden the attention perspective of “principle” and advocate standardizing the sovereign bond issuance market and make corresponding arrangements on the sovereign debt contract, foreign development aid mechanism and multilateral level.