《红高粱》以在西柏林获“金熊奖”的桂冠,而成为中国电影走向世界的标志。几十年来中国人民慨叹我们的电影不能自立于世界电影杰作之林的羞愧,被《红高粱》的光彩尽染成振奋、自豪之情。人们翘首企盼,一睹这部被国际电影界权威称之为“真正的”、“杰出的”、“最好的”片子。然而《红高粱》在观众中的反映却让人大吃一惊,交口称道大喊“痛快”者有;意味深长一笑以蔽之者有;摇头莫明其妙者有;大失所望后骂从口出者有……有人曾在小范围的电影爱好者中作过一次调查。把对这部影片的评价分成六个档次:很好、好、较好、可以、较差、糟糕。结果投“很好”票占5.5％;无人投“好”和“较好”的票;说“可以”的占22.2％;云“较差”者占66.7％;言“糟糕”者为5.6％。这个调查虽然局限性很大,不足以据此对《红高粱》作出国民的评判,然而这种有一定代表性的反映,总不会被《红高粱》剧组的功臣们和其他关注我国电影事业发展有 “Red Sorghum” to win the “Golden Bear Award” in West Berlin, and become the symbol of Chinese movies to the world. For decades, the Chinese people have lamented the shame that our films can not stand alone in the world of film masterpieces. They are dyed and inspired by the glory of “red sorghum.” People are eagerly anticipating and seeing the film being called “real”, “outstanding” and “best” by the international cinema authorities. However, “Red Sorghum” in the audience’s response was astonished people, shout “shout” praise; those who have a smile; unsure who; ... Someone has conducted a survey among a small group of movie buffs. The evaluation of the film is divided into six grades: good, good, better, can, worse, worse. The results cast “very good” votes accounted for 5.5%; no vote for “good” and “better” votes; that “can” accounted for 22.2%; cloud “worse” accounted for 66.7%; those who “bad” 5.6%. Although this survey is so limited that it can not judge the nationality of the “red sorghum” accordingly, this kind of representative reflection will not always be rewarded by the merits of the “Red Sorghum” cast and other concerns about the cause of our country’s film industry There is development