一读近期报刊,颇受鼓舞。有关繁荣中国建筑创作的理论问题,不仅学术界日益关注,而且社会舆论界也有所问津,这是建国以来所鲜有的。随着国家的文明化,建筑学这门集政治经济文化于一体的综合学科正在恢复它应有的地位。当然这方面还很落后。在发达国家,若干家喻户晓的建筑理论不只是建筑专家之间的自言自语,而是建筑、美学、新闻、哲学和社会活动家共同对话的结果。今日中国很少能听到这种对话。人们还不能象关心自己的时装和鞋样那样关心那些决定国家和城市面貌的建筑。这大概也是中国几千 I was encouraged by the recent reading of the press. The theoretical issues concerning the prosperity of architectural creation in China have not only attracted increasing attention from the academic community, but also attracted attention from the community of public opinion. This is rare since the founding of the People’s Republic of China. With the country’s civilization, architecture, an integrated discipline that integrates politics, economy and culture, is restoring its rightful place. Of course, this aspect is still lagging behind. In developed countries, a number of well-known architectural theories are not just talking to one another, but are the result of a common dialogue between architecture, aesthetics, journalism, philosophy, and social activists. China rarely hears this kind of dialogue today. People can’t care about the buildings that determine the appearance of the country and the city as much as they care about their own fashion and shoes. This is probably also a few thousand in China