论文部分内容阅读
有一种观点认为,东亚国家(或地区)已经取得的经济成就是执行纯自由放任主义政策的结果,而新近一种观点则把其完全归结为是政府高度干预的贡献,本文不同意这样两种观点。本文强调制度或组织变迁的作用,这些制度或组织是由对制度的初始条件和使得大量分散的个体通过市场最大可能地参与经济活动所采取的步骤都很了解的政府协调组织的。 在制度与组织变迁中政府行为的成功或失败与西蒙·库兹涅茨(Simon Kuznetz)提出的现代经济增长的三要素即现世主义、平等主义和民族主义相关。本文结束时证明了这些观点在东亚,尤其是在战后取得了惊人发展成就的台湾的适用性。
There is a view that the economic achievements that the East Asian countries (or regions) have made are the result of the implementation of the policy of purely laissez-faire, and the recent view that they completely reduce their contribution to the high degree of interference by the government. This article disagrees with both View. This article emphasizes the role of institutions or organizational changes that are coordinated by governments that understand the initial conditions of the system and the steps that have been taken to bring the large numbers of dispersed individuals through the market into their economic activities to the maximum extent possible. The success or failure of government behavior in institutional and organizational changes relates to the three elements of modern economic growth proposed by Simon Kuznetz: secularism, egalitarianism and nationalism. This article concludes with proof of the applicability of these views in East Asia, especially Taiwan, which has achieved phenomenal growth in the post-war period.