农业科学通讯1954年第4期中有朱来志报导“治淮后对于农业科学技术的新要求”一文,对安徽农业生产改革——“三改”解释为“改种高产量作物,改变收获期收成比重,改变土壤深度。”但据我们理解“三改”的具体内容是:(一)在经常遭受旱涝灾害的地区应改变季节的收成比重;(二)改种高产作物,改种耐水作物,改变某些作物的播种方法;(三)改变广积薄收的习惯,采用深耕细作的办法进行耕种。(详见安徽日报1954年1月1日曾希望主席论“三改对防灾保收和争取丰收的重大意义”)因此,朱同志的解释是太简单化了,使读者看来模糊不清,且对第三点片面理解为改变土壤深度,更是牛唇不对马嘴,因为有广种薄收的习惯存在,才强调提出采用深耕细作的办法进行耕种,二者的发生和发展是互相联系着的,我们不可以分割开来看待。即就深耕细作一方面来说吧,也并不完全等于说是改变土壤深度(事实上改变土壤深度这句话的本身也很有问题,应 In the fourth issue of 1954, Zhu Laizhi reported that “the new requirements for agricultural science and technology after the Huaihe River issue” reflected the reform of agricultural production in Anhui Province - “three changes” as “re-planting high-yield crops, Change the proportion of harvest during the harvest period and change the depth of the soil. ”However, according to our understanding, the details of“ three changes ”are: (1) to change the proportion of seasonal harvests in areas affected by droughts and floods; (2) High-yielding crops, replanting of water-resistant crops, and changing the sowing methods of some crops; (3) Changing the habit of widening and thinning, and cultivating them by deep plowing and fine workmanship. (For details, see Anhui Daily January 1, 1954, I hoped that the chairman of the “three changes on disaster prevention and collection and strive for great significance”) Therefore, the interpretation of Zhu Tongzhi too simplistic, so that readers seem vague Unclear, and one-sided understanding of the third point to change the depth of the soil, but also the wrong lips, because there are a wide range of thin income habits, it stressed the use of plowing and cultivation approach to farming, the occurrence and development of the two are interrelated With, we can not be divided. That is to say, on the one hand, it is not entirely equal to saying that it is a matter of changing the depth of the soil (in fact, the very fact of changing the depth of the soil is also very problematic.