论文部分内容阅读
目的:检验中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的信效度.方法:用中文版认知方式问卷(短版)、无望抑郁问卷、自悯量表对415名大学生进行测量,对其中55名大学生四周后重测中文版认知方式问卷(短版).结果:中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的Cronbaeh α系数为0.77,分半信度为0.67,四周的重测信度为0.85;探索性因素分析得一个特征根大于1的因子,解释总变异的40.32％;中文版认知方式问卷(短版)的得分与无望抑郁问卷的得分显著正相关,与自悯量表的得分显著负相关.结论:中文版认知方式问卷(短版)具有较好的信效度,可以用来测量我国大学生的认知方式.“,”This study examined the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Short-Form version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire(CCSQ-SF).415 Chinese undergraduates(306 men,109 women; mean age=19.2 years,SD=1.04)completed the CCSQ-SF along with the Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire(HDSQ) and Self-Compassion Scale(SCS).The internal consistency of the CCSQ-SF was high(Cronbach alpha=0.77),and the split-half coefficient and test-retest correlation after 4 weeks were satisfactory(r=0.67 and 0.85,respectively).Pearson correlations of the scores on the CCSQ-SF with the criterion measures(HDSQ and SCS) were in the expected directions.The CCSQ-SF is appropriate for measuring negative cognitive style among Chinese students.