论文部分内容阅读
目的:试验比较并分析米非司酮与左炔诺孕酮治疗紧急避孕的临床疗效。方法:选取我院紧急避孕112例患者,随机分为米非司酮组与左炔诺孕酮组。米非司酮组给予米非司酮治疗,左炔诺孕酮组给予左炔诺孕酮治疗。比较两组患者治疗效果、对患者月经的影响及不良反应发生率。结果:米非司酮组患者的治疗效果优于左炔诺孕酮组,米非司酮组患者的不良反应发生率低于左炔诺孕酮组,P<0.05,差异有统计意义。结论:米非司酮在紧急避孕的临床应用方面较左炔诺孕酮有明显优势,值得推广。
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of mifepristone and levonorgestrel in the treatment of emergency contraception. Methods: 112 cases of emergency contraception in our hospital were randomly divided into mifepristone group and levonorgestrel group. The mifepristone group was given mifepristone treatment, and the levonorgestrel group was given levonorgestrel treatment. The effects of two groups of patients on the treatment, the impact on the patient’s menstruation and the incidence of adverse reactions. Results: The treatment effect of mifepristone group was better than that of levonorgestrel group. The incidence of adverse reactions in mifepristone group was lower than that of levonorgestrel group (P <0.05). The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Mifepristone has obvious advantages over levonorgestrel in the clinical application of emergency contraception and is worth promoting.