论文部分内容阅读
在财产保全制度中,当财产保全被认定为有错误或基于其它原因,法院而解除对财产的保全时,是否也应当同时解除对申请人提供的担保财产的查封、扣押、冻结措施呢?对此问题,现行法律缺乏明确的规定,这严重影响了财产保全制度功能的发挥。本文通过对我国现行立法及司法实践的分析,提出了解决此问题的两种途径:一是行使法官的释明义务,二是赋予申请人以催告权。
In the property preservation system, when the property preservation is found to be wrong or the court removes the property preservation, should it also lift the seizure, seizure and freezing measures of the property provided by the applicant at the same time? This problem, the current law lacks explicit provisions, which seriously affect the function of property preservation system. By analyzing the current legislation and judicial practice in our country, this article proposes two ways to solve this problem: one is to exercise the judge’s obligation of interpretation and the other is to give the applicant the right to sue.