陆文龙同志发表在《中国花卉盆景》1986年第12期上的《也谈盆景的风格与流派》一文,关于先创各自风格再立流派的见解是正确的。但对流派的理解,值得商榷。按陆同志意见,只要数量“多”,加上“千遍一律”的“程式”或“形式”,就形成了流派。事实上,流派绝不仅仅是某一位“个人”在表现形式上有什么特征,被子弟们千篇一律地重复而成。模仿不是艺术,更谈不上风格,千人一面怎能称流派? Comrade Lu Wenlong published the article “On the style and genre of bonsai” on the 12th issue of China Flower and Bonsai in 1986, and it is correct to establish the viewpoints of establishing their own style of reincarnation. But the understanding of the genre is debatable. According to Comrade Lu Lu’s opinion, as long as the number of “more” and “one program” or “form” of “one size fits all” forms a school of genres. In fact, the genre is more than just a feature of a certain “individual” in its manifestations. It is repeated by the children in a stereotyped manner. Imitation is not art, let alone style, thousands of people can be called genre side?