论文部分内容阅读
确定第三人披露证据的义务可以大大节约诉讼资源,有利于诉讼真实的发现,有利于我国的审判模式从职权主义向当事人主义的转变。英美法系国家通过证据开示程序要求第三人披露证据;大陆法系国家是通过规定第三人的协助义务予以确认。我国关于第三人证据披露义务的法律规定条款极少且不完善。完善我国第三人证据披露义务的基本思路:坚持第三人证据披露义务立法原则,把第三人证据披露义务的范围限于文书证据的范畴,请求第三人披露证据的阶段应当限制在举证时效之内,如果第三人违背披露证据的义务就必须承担一定的责任。
The obligation of third party to disclose evidence can greatly save litigation resources, is conducive to the real discovery of litigation, and is conducive to the change of our trial mode from authoritarianism to authoritarianism. Common law countries require disclosure of evidence by third parties through the procedure of discovery of evidence; civil law countries confirm this by stipulating the third party’s assistance obligation. The provisions of the legal provisions on the obligation of third party to disclose evidence in our country are very few and imperfect. The basic idea of perfecting the obligation of disclosure of third-party evidence in China: Adhere to the legislative principle of the third party’s obligation of disclosure of information, limit the scope of third-party disclosure obligation to that of documentary evidence and the stage of requesting third party to disclose evidence should be limited to the period of proof If the third party violates the obligation to disclose evidence, he must assume certain responsibilities.