论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价浅表性膀胱肿瘤腔内不同治疗方法及其临床应用价值。方法:回顾性分析经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)458例及经尿道膀胱肿瘤电气化术(TUVBT)113例治疗浅表性膀胱肿瘤的情况,比较两组的手术时间、术中和术后出血量、并发症发生率和术后肿瘤复发率。结果:TUVBT组术中、术后出血量及并发症方面明显少于TURBT组,差异有显著性(P<0.01),且TUVBT组有易于操作、术中视野清晰的优点。其余方面两组比较无显著性(P>0．05)。结论:TUVBT治疗浅表性膀胱肿瘤较TURBT具有更好的临床应用价值。
Objective: To evaluate the different treatment methods and their clinical value in the treatment of superficial bladder tumor. Methods: 458 cases of transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) and 113 cases of transurethral bladder tumor electrification (TUVBT) were retrospectively analyzed for the treatment of superficial bladder tumors. The operative time, intraoperative and postoperative Bleeding volume, the incidence of complications and postoperative tumor recurrence rate. Results: TUVBT group had less postoperative bleeding and complications than TURBT group (P <0.01), and TUVBT group had the advantages of easy operation and clear intraoperative vision. The rest of the two groups was no significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion: TUVBT has better clinical value than TURBT in the treatment of superficial bladder tumor.