我国史学界在论及“批判继承史学遗产”这个问题时,往往与“批判继承历史遗产”的提法联在一起,甚至相互混用。这两种提法仅一字之差,实际却相去甚远。二者产生的时代条件和出发点都不相同,因而具有不同的目的、对象和方法,是两种性质完全不同的工作。从发生的时间来看,批判继承历史遗产的提出显然在前,而且声势和影响也大得多。因此,史学界批判继承史学遗产的工作在思想方法和工作方法上,有意无意地受到了一些影响和干扰,致使这项工作难以深入下去。这里,我们首先对这两种提 When discussing the issue of the inheritance of critical historiography, historians of our country always associate themselves with the formulation of “critically inheriting the historical heritage” and even mix with each other. The difference between these two kinds of reference is actually far cry from the actual one. Both the conditions of the times and the starting points produced by the two are different. Therefore, they have different purposes, objects and methods and are two completely different kinds of work. Judging from the time of occurrence, the advent of critically inheriting the historical heritages is clearly preceded, and the momentum and influence are much greater. Therefore, the historiography critics inherit the heritage of history as a work of thought and method of work, which have been affected by some unknowingly and disturbances, making it difficult to go deep into this work. Here, we first of these two mention