最近由於文藝界通過「紅樓夢」研究對胡適思想的毒害正在進行揭露和批判,引起了教育界的興趣。我認為通過胡適批判來檢查並肅清我國教育工作者以及我自己所受的资產階級思想影響是十分必要的。胡適的反動影響從一九一九年算起到解放為止整三十年。根據北大圖書舘舘長向達同志所提出的一系列的文献,證明了胡適的影響是廣泛的。他通過國際文化特務孟祿曾掌握文化基金董事會影響了全國三十七個高等學校和學術機關,不論在哲學、文學、歷史、藝街、教育甚至科學方面都受到了他的思想毒害。在思想上,他通過中華教育改進社作了杜威的帮兇,代表了五四運動中資產階級的右翼影響了全國青年,甚至可以說他的幽靈至今還籠罩着不少學者的頭腦。我們的任務是在從教育的角度來趕鬼驅邪。胡適根本談不上什麼「家」,雖然他所販賣的美帝國主義资產階級的思想有它的體系,但他自己却沒有成整套體系的著作,他自己也承認講學做文章很雜亂,從墨子小取篇到曹雪芹生年的考證,從文學改良到西洋文化無所不談,他的特點是贫於創造的理論,僅僅是一個帝國主義市儈思想的代言人。因為他是美帝國主義的忠實走狗,是十足的知識買辦,有華爾街的金元和美帝資產階級學術界的撑腰,所以才能在中國牌子大、地位高而影響很多青年。一九一九年四月,他在新教育雜誌杜威號寫了他有生以來唯一的一篇教育學的文章:「杜威的教育哲學」。他始終祇是杜威的傳聲筒。他自己說過「我不是專門學教育的人」,他同年在江蘇省教育會的演說中,也說他祇是做弟子應盡的職分,替老師開出一條道兒,再加一些洒掃的工夫。其他的文章如「對新學制的感想」、「論中國的國文教學」、「讀書法」、「教育破產的救濟方法還是教育」,以及解放前不久發表的「爭取學術獨立的十年計劃」等祇是一些零碎的意見。胡適本人一向是瞧不起教育學的,他的大弟子傅斯年是反對教育學的突出的例子,他們 Recently, as the literary and art circles exposed and criticized the poisoning of Hu Shih’s thinking through the study of “Dream of Red Mansions”, it has aroused the interest of the educational circles. I think it is absolutely necessary to examine and eliminate the bourgeois influence of our country’s educators and myself through Hu Shih’s critique. The reactionary influence of Hu Shi has spanned thirty years from 1919 to liberation. According to a series of documents put forward by the director of Peking University Library to Tatung, it is proved that Hu’s influence is extensive. Through the International Cultural Spokesman Monroe had mastered the board of the Cultural Foundation, which affected 37 colleges and universities and academic institutions in the country. He suffered from his ideology both in philosophy, literature, history, art street, education and even science. In his thinking, he made an accomplice of Dewey through the China Education Improvement Association, representing the right wing of the May Fourth Movement that affected the entire nation. Even his ghosts are still shrouded in the minds of many scholars. Our task is to exorcise evil spirits from the perspective of education. Although Hu Shih simply sold his system of thinking about the American imperialist bourgeoisie, he did not have a complete set of books on his own. He himself admits that lecturing is very chaotic. From Mozi A small article to Cao Xueqin years of research, from literature to Western culture to talk about everything, he is characterized by poverty in the creation of theory, just a spokesman for the imperialist market theory. Because he is a faithful lackey of US imperialism, a fortune-telling buy-in of knowledge, backed by Wall Street Jinyuan and the US imperialism bourgeois academics, he can influence many young people in China with a big status and a high status. In April 1919, he wrote his only essay on education in his new education magazine Dewey: “Dewey’s Educational Philosophy.” He’s always just Dewey’s megaphone. He himself said, “I am not a person specialized in education.” In the same speech he made at the Jiangsu Provincial Education Association in the same year, he also said that he was only a disciple of his disciples, The time. Other articles such as “Thoughts on the New Academic Structure,” “Chinese Language Teaching in China,” “Reading Methodology,” “Remedies for Education Bankruptcy, or Education,” and “Ten Years of Academic Independence” Just a few piecemeal opinions. Hu Shi himself has always been despised pedagogy, and his eldest son, Fu Sinian, is a prominent example of anti-pedagogy,