论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入在小儿哮喘疾病治疗中的临床效果。方法选取2014年4月至2015年4月支气管哮喘急性发作的患儿74例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组37例,对照组患儿给予空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,观察组患儿给予氧驱动雾化吸入治疗,对比两组患儿治疗后的临床效果。结果治疗3 d后,观察组患儿治疗后的总有效率为97.2%,对照组为81.0%,观察组患儿在治疗效率和血氧饱和度明显改善情况等方面显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两组患儿均应用硫酸沙丁胺醇雾化溶液(万托林溶液)、复方异丙托溴铵溶液联合布地奈德混悬液进行治疗,但采用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗的观察组临床效果显著优于对照组,并且产生的不良反应较少,值得在临床上推广和应用。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of aerosol driven aerosol inhalation and aerosol pump aerosol inhalation in the treatment of pediatric asthma diseases. Methods 74 children with acute bronchial asthma from April 2014 to April 2015 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 37 cases in each group. Children in control group were treated with atomizing inhalation by air compression pump and observation group Children given oxygen-driven inhalation therapy, compared with the clinical effect of two groups of children after treatment. Results After 3 days of treatment, the total effective rate was 97.2% in the observation group and 81.0% in the control group. The observation group was significantly better than the control group in terms of the treatment efficiency and the oxygen saturation. There was statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusions The two groups of children were treated with Salbutamol Sulfate solution (Vtopine solution) and Compound ipratropium bromide solution combined with budesonide suspension. However, the clinical effect of oxygenated atomization inhalation treatment group was significant Which is better than the control group and produces fewer adverse reactions, which is worth popularizing and applying clinically.