论文部分内容阅读
本文选译自英国朗格曼图书出版公司1962年出版的热带农业丛书《剑麻》一书的第三章,原题为“种植材料与苗圃技术”。这里只选译此文的头两部分。本文就珠芽和吸芽用作种植材料时孰优孰劣问题,根据试验数据作了分析。认为珠芽和吸芽本质上是相同的,但由于珠芽预先经过苗圃培育,生长比较一致,早期营养发育较好,是株芽作为种植材料有利的一面.吸芽一般不经苗圃培育,可以直接取自大田,种植较易,但生长较不一致.至于纤维产量,两类植株差异不大.结论认为,不论哪一类种植材料,只要定植时营养发育相同,两者同样可以生产.同时,文章分析了剑麻叶缘带刺和不带刺的原因.
This article is selected from the third chapter of a book entitled “Sisal”, a series of books on tropical agriculture published by the Langeman Book and Publication Company of England in 1962, entitled “Planting Materials and Nursery Techniques”. Only the first two parts of this article are chosen here. This article on the bead buds and suction buds used as planting material which one is better, according to the experimental data were analyzed. It is considered that the bud and the bud are basically the same in nature, but because the bud is preliminarily nursed and grew well, the early nutrition is well developed and the bud is the favorable side of the planting material. Since the field, planting easier, but less consistent growth.As for the fiber yield, the difference between the two types of plants.Conclusion that, regardless of what kind of planting material, as long as the same nutrient development when planting, both can also produce the same time, the article analysis The reason for the spines and spines of sisal leaves.