论文部分内容阅读
1993年9月杭州市中级人民法院民事审判庭受理了第一起建筑工程设计合同纠纷案。在该案审理过程中,《中华人民共和国经济合同法》作了修改。修改后的《经济合同法》与原《经济合同法》、《建筑工程勘察设计合同条例》就有关工程设计合同的签订有不同规定。因此本案是适用修改后的《经济合同法》还是适用修改前的《经济合同法》?是适用修改后的《经济合同法》,还是适用根据原《经济合同法》制定的《建筑工程勘察设计合同条例》?最高人民法院(1993)39号文件中的司法解释该如何理解?在这些问题上,原、被告代理律师意见相悖,虽然该案已经调解结案,但是该案所涉及的新旧合同法交替、特殊法与一般法冲突时的法
In September 1993, the Civil Trial Court of Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court accepted the first dispute over the contract for the design of construction projects. During the hearing of the case, the “Economic Contract Law of the People's Republic of China” was amended. The revised “Economic Contract Law” and the original “Economic Contract Law”, “Construction Engineering Investigation and Design Contract Ordinance” on the engineering design contracts have different provisions. Therefore, is the case applicable to the amended “Economic Contract Law” or the “Economic Contract Law” before the amendment? Is it applicable to the amended “Economic Contract Law” or is it applicable to the “Construction Contract Survey and Design Contract Law ”? The Supreme People's Court (1993) No. 39 judicial interpretation of how to understand? On these issues, the original, defendants counsel contrary to opinion, although the case has been mediation closed, but the case involving the old and the new contract law Alternation, special law and common law conflict