论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,关于中国史学史研究如何深入,是一些同行十分关心的问题。有鉴于此,我趁着2011年参加一个学术研讨会的机会,写了一篇题为《试论中国史学史研究的新路向》的文章,发表于《天津社会科学》2012年第1期。我在此文中所说的“新路向”:一是认为中国史学自古以来都有重视理论的传统,因此加强理论研究是第一个“新路向”。二是近几十年来,中国史学史多以史家或史书为主要研究对象,这是八十多年前梁启超提出来的。时至今日,这种研究模式仍有其存在的价值,尤其是对初学者来说,它仍然是起步阶段的“必修课”。但是,如果要从学术前沿的开拓与创新来看,似应把研究的重点转移到以问
In recent years, how to conduct in-depth studies on the history of Chinese historiography is a matter of great concern to some of our colleagues. In light of this, I took advantage of the opportunity to attend a symposium in 2011 and wrote an essay titled “A New Approach to the Study of the History of Chinese Historiography”, published in Tianjin Social Science Bulletin, No. 1, 2012. As I said in this article, “New Way”: First, China historians have always attached importance to the theory of tradition. Therefore, strengthening theoretical research is the first “new road”. Second, in recent decades, historians and historians in the history of China have mostly made research objects, which was raised by Liang Qichao more than 80 years ago. Today, this research model still has its own value, especially for beginners, it is still the “compulsory ”. However, if we look at the pioneering and innovative frontiers of academic research, we should shift our research focus to