“经济法”一词的字面含义至少在法学圈外极大地影响了人们对经济法内容的正确认识。当法院取消经济庭设置而以民二庭或民三庭取而代之时,一些人开始质疑经济法学科存在的意义,更有经济法学家感叹:“这等于在承认部门经济法的同时又否定了经济法的独立性。”而当我们自己——在新一轮的政法大学院系更名中,也不能如愿以偿地自称为“经济法学院”。这些事实虽然并未使经济法独立学科的地位有所动摇,但带给人们对经济法认知的困惑以及经济法学者们内心的尴尬却是不能忽视的!近年来,一场经济法与社会法关系的争论,使经济法又一次陷入“名分之争”的困扰!主张经济法从属于社会法的学者认为:经济法最终体现社会本位的价值观;而主张经济法并行于社会法的学 The literal meaning of the term “economic law” has greatly influenced people’s correct understanding of the contents of economic law, at least outside the circle of law. When the court abolished the establishment of the economic court and replaced it with the civil tribunals or the civil tribunals, some people began to question the significance of the existence of the law of economic law. More economists argue: “This amounts to admitting the economic law of a department and denying it Economic Law Independence. ”And when we ourselves - in the new round of the renamed colleges of political science and law, can not get it on its own as“ Economic Law School. ” Although these facts have not shaken the status of the independent subject of economic law, the confusion that has brought people to the recognition of economic law and the awkwardness of economic law scholars can not be neglected. In recent years, an economic law and society Arguing that the economic law is once again caught in the “factional dispute”! Advocates of economic law subordinate to the social law scholars believe that: economic law ultimately embodies the values ​​of social standards; and advocate economic law parallel to the social law Learn