论文部分内容阅读
一、引言韩礼德和哈桑(Halliday&Hasan,1976)在他们出版的Cohesion in English一书中提出了语篇衔接的概念,并进行了系统的研究,提出了衔接的基本理论框架和在语篇中的具体体现。此书出版后,立刻在学术界产生了很大的反响,有的进行了进一步研究,如马丁(Martin,1992);有的也从不同的角度提出了批评意见,如维多逊(Widdowson,1977)认为,衔接是一种言内行为,而连贯是言外行为;而布朗和俞尔(Brown&Yule,1983)则把衔接看作一个形式概念,认为它与连贯没有关系。所以,现在对于衔接与连贯是什么关系,是否可以根据衔接来推断语篇的连贯还没有一个清晰的认识,还需要在这几方面做更加深入的研究。
I. Introduction Halliday & Hasan (1976) put forward the concept of discourse cohesion in their book, Cohesion in English, and conducted a systematic study and put forward the basic theoretical framework of cohesion and in the discourse Specific embodiment. Immediately after the publication of this book, there was a great response in academia, some of which were further studied, such as Martin (1992), and others criticized from different perspectives, such as Widdowson 1977) argues that cohesion is an act of speech and coherence is an act of nonsense. Brown and Yule (1983), for example, regard cohesion as a formal notion that it has nothing to do with coherence. Therefore, there is no clear understanding of the relationship between cohesion and coherence, whether coherence of discourse cohesion can be inferred based on cohesion, and further research on these aspects is needed.