抵御饲养动物侵袭行为的法律性质在大部分情况下存在争议,对饲养动物侵袭进行抵御是否认定为刑法上的紧急避险,对物防卫说在此事件是否可以适用,抵御行为是否需要承担法律责任。以昆明杜高犬咬保安案为例,列举不同情况,分析在不同情况下抵御饲养动物侵袭行为的法律性质。 In most cases, there is controversy over the legal nature of the act of attacking animal husbandry. Whether defending the animal against infestation is considered to be an emergency hedge against criminal law, whether the defense of the thing can be applied at this incident or not, and whether or not the act of defense needs to bear legal liability . Taking the case of bite guards in Kunming Dugao for example, this paper enumerates different situations and analyzes the legal nature of defending the animal invaders in different situations.