论文部分内容阅读
人权保障是刑法学中一个极为重要的问题,刑法的社会秩序维护和人权保障功能是辩证统一的。在刑法中是否应当引入不利解释以促进人权保障值得探讨。不利解释的起源、价值、适用范围有自己的特点,不利解释原则与刑法的价值相偏离,与刑法存疑时有利于被告原则以及国民可预测性存在差异,不利解释在刑法中的适用具有非正当性、非必要性。因此,不宜采纳。
Protection of human rights is an extremely important issue in criminal law. The function of safeguarding the social order and safeguarding human rights in criminal law is dialectically unified. Whether to introduce adverse explanations in the criminal law to promote the protection of human rights is worth discussing. The origin, value and scope of unfavorable interpretation have their own characteristics. The principle of unfavorable interpretation deviates from the value of criminal law, and the principle of defendant and the predictability of nationality are different when the criminal law is in doubt. The unfavorable interpretation is unfair to the application of criminal law Sexual, non-essential. Therefore, it should not be adopted.