论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨青岛市疾病控制中心2010年~2012年能力验证/实验室间比对结果。方法对中心参加中国合格评定国家认可委员会(CNAS)、省质监局等上级业务部门组织实施的能力验证计划、实验室间比对情况进行分析。结果参加CNAS组织的能力验证活动多占35.8%,省质监局组织占17.0%,其他上级业务部门组织占47.2%;参加食品及相关产品领域能力验证活动较多,占45.3%,疾病控制类检测其次占22.6%,其他领域占32.1%;检测结果满意率较高,次数满意率为92.5%,项目满意率为96.2%。结论各监管部门逐年加大组织力度但存在相互独立及检测领域分布不平衡,部分领域缺乏能力验证提供者;实验室部分项目检测水平有待进一步提高,通过查找原因、纠正预防,实现质量管理体系良性运转。
Objective To investigate the capacity verification / laboratory comparison results of Qingdao Municipal CDC from 2010 to 2012. Methods The competency verification plan that the center participates in the CNAS and the quality supervision bureau and other superior business units organized by China Center for Disease Control and Prevention is analyzed. Results More than 35.8% were attending competency verification activities in CNAS, 17.0% in Provincial Bureau of Quality Supervision, and 47.2% in other superior departments. There were more capacity verification activities in the field of food and related products, accounting for 45.3% Followed by detection accounted for 22.6%, other areas accounted for 32.1%; test results with a high satisfaction rate was 92.5% satisfaction rate, the project satisfaction rate was 96.2%. Conclusion Each regulatory department intensified its efforts year by year but was independent of each other and its distribution in the field of testing was unbalanced. Some areas lacked the providers of proficiency testing. The testing level of some projects in the laboratory needs to be further improved. Corrections were carried out to find out the reasons and achieve a sound quality management system Run.