论文部分内容阅读
2004年10月,全国人大常委会公布了的《物权法》第二次审议稿在第十六章首次提出了居住权制度。可是2006年8月举行的十届全国人大常委会第23次会议对草案进行的五审之中,居住权制度被断然删除。现行《物权法》最终也没有采纳这一大陆法系国家传统的制度。本文认为,居住权作为一项舶来品,在纳入《物权法》以前必须经过谨慎的制度改造,不宜操之过急。否则可能会与我国的社会现状格格不入。
In October 2004, the second draft of the “Property Law” promulgated by the NPC Standing Committee promulgated the residence rights system for the first time in Chapter XVI. However, during the fifth trial of the draft held at the 23rd meeting of the Standing Committee of the 10th NPC held in August 2006, the system of residency was categorically deleted. The current “Property Law” eventually failed to adopt the traditional system of this civil law country. This article argues that residency as an imported product must be cautiously reformed before inclusion in the Property Law and should not be overkill. Otherwise, it may be incompatible with the social situation in our country.