论文部分内容阅读
:《敦煌实录》是以记载北凉以前敦煌先贤耆旧为主的郡国之书 ,将其作为实录体史书的最早撰述缺乏足够的史料支持。《敦煌实录》的卷数有十卷、二十卷的不同记载 ,其原因已很难考究 ,学者提出的“先为十卷后增为二十卷”的假说毫无根据 ,难以成立
: The Record of Dunhuang is a book of the country that records the sages and dwellings of the sages in Dunhuang before the Northern Liang as the earliest compilation of historical records of the recorded book lacks sufficient historical support. The reason for the different records of Dunhuang Recorded in 10 volumes and 20 volumes is very difficult to study. The hypothesis of “first adding 10 volumes to 20 volumes” put forward by scholars was groundless and difficult to set up