明清实学作为中国思想文化由古代到近代过渡的一个中介环节,理应得到相应的历史地位,并加以系统而全面的理解和阐述,但是囿于种种原因,由于选择的研究视角和价值取向的不同,或着重于外在经世一面,或着重于内在心性一面,缺乏统一整全的多侧面的把握,难免造成对明清实学理解的偏狭性。而《明清实学思潮史》以下简称《实学史》),却视野开阔,从纵横两个维度进行探索,理清了实学演变的来龙去脉,开掘了实学研究的新领域,确定了实学应有的历史地位,给人以全新的印象,堪称明清实学研究的一次深化与拓展。《实学史》作为一部学术专著,对明中叶以后出现的而又发生深远影响的实学思潮,第一次经过分析界定之后给予如此的称谓。对于实 Ming and Qing Dynasties, as an intermediary link in the transition of Chinese thought and culture from ancient to modern times, deserved corresponding historical status and systematically and comprehensively understood and expounded it. However, due to various reasons, due to the different perspectives of research and value orientation , Or focus on the external side of the world, or focus on the inner side of the heart, the lack of a unified and comprehensive grasp of the multi-sided, inevitably lead to understanding of Ming and Qing Dynasties practical bias. However, “History of Practical Tide of Ming and Qing Dynasties”, hereinafter referred to as “Practical Learning History”), but with a broad field of vision, explores from both vertical and horizontal dimensions, clarifies the ins and outs of the evolution of real learning, digs out new fields of real learning, Historical status, giving a new impression, called the Ming and Qing Dynasties real study of a deepening and expansion. As an academic monograph, “Practical History of Learning”, the real learning trend of thought that appeared after the middle of Ming Dynasty but had a far-reaching influence, was given the title after analysis and definition for the first time. For real