全球化是一个复杂的现象,它包括经济、金融、政治、科技、环境、文化和军事等各个方面。但是对一个国家来说,它可能只倾向于接受全球化中的某几个方面,因此将全球化的各个方面单独划分开来就显得很重要。但尽管如此,像生态环境全球化和科技全球化是每个国家都参与的。有时候当地的人们一味反对全球化,反而忽视了某些很有效地推进反贫穷的政策。本文着眼于分析中印两国在全球化影响下的人均收入水平,分配制度和社会宏观状况等的差异,指出中国在全球化趋势下的发展比印度好得多。中国和印度之间的比较基于大量变量的基础之上,比如工资待遇和劳动环境的不同就可以解释中小企业信息技术部竞争力的不同。劳动力被证明是影响两国竞争力的惟一因素,更进一步地说,实际上是两国劳动生产力和劳动立法的差异导致了两国不同的竞争力,并不仅仅是劳动力的价格导致的差异。许多人分析了中国成功的种种因素,得出中国的成功是因为她显示出了和“高潜力亚洲经济”一样的特色。中国的贫困水平远低于印度而且人均收入水平是印度的两倍。劳动生产力和劳动立法是导致这个差距的重要因素,但不是最关键的。中国通过改革开放融入到全球经济一体化的趋势中,从中获益比印度要大得多,这是成功的关键所在。尽管现阶段在收入分配上存在着很大的不平等,但社会的总体运行状况还是很不错的。 Globalization is a complex phenomenon that includes all aspects of economy, finance, politics, science and technology, environment, culture and military. But for a country, it may only be inclined to accept certain aspects of globalization, so it is important to separate the various aspects of globalization separately. Nevertheless, such as the globalization of the ecological environment and the globalization of science and technology are all countries involved. Sometimes local people blindly oppose globalization, but neglect some of the very effective policies to promote anti-poverty. This paper aims to analyze the differences in per capita income level, distribution system and macroeconomic conditions under the influence of globalization between China and India, and points out that China is developing much more under the globalization trend than India. The comparison between China and India is based on a large number of variables, such as differences in wages and working conditions, that explain the differences in the competitiveness of SMEs’ IT departments. The labor force has proved to be the only factor that affects the competitiveness of the two countries. To put it in a nutshell, the difference between labor productivity and labor legislation in fact leads to different competitiveness between the two countries, not just the price difference caused by the labor force. Many people analyzed various factors of China’s success and came to China’s success because she showed the same characteristics as the “high-potential Asian economy.” China’s poverty level is much lower than India’s and its per capita income level is twice that of India. Labor productivity and labor legislation are important factors contributing to this gap, but not the most crucial ones. China has benefited greatly from the trend of global economic integration through its reform and opening up. This is a key to its success. Although there is great inequality in income distribution at this stage, the overall social performance is still not bad.