论文部分内容阅读
承包制不能明确产权码? 一、“两权分离”质疑我国企业改革是按照所有权和经营权可以适当分离的逻辑思路展开的。在不改变国家所有制性质的前提下,赋予企业充分的经营权——对国有资产实际占有、支配和使用的权力。从某种意义上说,国有资产归企业“所有”,只是在最终的法律归宿上企业没有“所有权”。不言而喻,若这种分离能有组织保证并付诸运行,那对强化企业利益倾向、增强企业活力无疑具有积极作用。现行的租赁制和承包制就是两权分离的实践形式。
The contract system cannot clearly define the property right code. First, the “Separation of the two powers” questioned that the reform of China’s enterprises is based on the logic that ownership and business rights can be appropriately separated. Without prejudice to changes in the nature of state ownership, companies are given full rights to operate—the right to actually possess, control, and use state-owned assets. In a sense, state-owned assets are “owned” by the enterprise, but the company does not have “ownership” in the ultimate legal destination. It goes without saying that if such separation can be organized and put into operation, it will undoubtedly have a positive effect on strengthening corporate interests and enhancing corporate vigor. The current lease and contracting system is the practice of separation of powers.