《新闻记者》第4期上发表金东水同志《话说新闻改革的“京派”与“海派”》一文,这确实是值得一议的问题。我先要说,金文题目不够确切。应当是新闻写作的“京派”与“海派”,是就新闻业务领域而言的。金文说成“新闻改革的‘京派’与‘海派’”,新闻改革的范围比较广了,除了新闻业务问题之外,还包括新闻体制等等大问题。而且就“改革”而言,是不大好分什么“派”的。金文一开头讲在上海好新闻评选会上听到的。这话正好是我在会上说的。但这种说法的真正来源是在北京或其它地方。我在会上说,北京有一种说法:新闻有“京派”、“海派”之分,我 It is indeed worth discussing the issue of “Beijing School” and “Shanghai School” written by Comrade Kim Dong-shui in the fourth issue of “Journalists”. I would like to say first, gold title is not exact enough. The “Beijing School” and the “Shanghai School” that should be used for news writing are for the field of news business. Jinwen said “the Beijing School and the Shanghai School” of news reform. The scope of the news reform is relatively wide. Apart from news business issues, major issues such as the news system are also covered. And as far as “reform” is concerned, what is the “pie”? Jin Wen said at the beginning of a good news conference in Shanghai heard. This is exactly what I said at the meeting. But the real source of this statement is in Beijing or elsewhere. At the meeting, I said that there is a saying in Beijing that the news is divided into “Beijing School” and “Shanghai School”, and I