论文部分内容阅读
【案情】李某与张某系同村农民,一次李某在给自家的玉米喷药时,因风力作用,药水飘到张某的西瓜地里,致使张某10亩地的西瓜大部分死蔫歉收。为此,张某要求李某赔偿其瓜苗费500元、化肥费1000元、西瓜损失2万元。李某拒赔,张某诉至法院。然而就在法院即将作出一审判决时,一场洪水使李某的玉米和张某的西瓜(包括已死亡的和剩下的)都被冲得无影无踪。李某立即向法院主张其赔偿责任不成立。【解析】根据公平原则,李某应当适当补偿张某的西瓜损失,并适当
【Case】 Lee and Zhang Department of the same village farmers, once in their own corn spray Lee, because of the wind, medicine floated Zhang's watermelon, resulting in Zhang 10 acres of watermelon most dead Poor harvest. To this end, Zhang asked Lee compensation melon seedling fee 500 yuan, 1,000 yuan fertilizer fee, watermelon loss of 20,000 yuan. Lee refused to pay, Zhang sued the court. However, just before the court's first instance verdict, a flood caused Lee's corn and Zhang's watermelons, including both dead and the rest, to be washed away. Lee immediately claimed to the court that its liability is not established. [Analysis] According to the principle of fairness, Lee should be appropriate compensation for the loss of watermelon Zhang, and appropriate