对马克思“劳动”批判真实语境的误读是西方学者逃离社会批判理论唯物主义路径的主要原因之一。在马克思社会批判理论体系中,“劳动”批判是在历史辩证法的现实逻辑中得到整体定位的:第一,劳动是在实践哲学视角中凸现的感性活动,劳动概念的形成与实践概念的提升存在着内在的联系;第二,现实的人及其社会关系是马克思“劳动”批判的主体性依据,劳动确切地讲是社会批判理论现实、历史的载体;第三,劳动活动历史超越性的实质是工具理性的现实消解,而不是非劳动美学设定。 Misreading of the true context of Marx’s “Labor” criticism is one of the main reasons why western scholars escape from the social critical theoretical materialism. In the Marxist system of social critical theory, the critique of “labor” is the overall orientation in the realistic logic of historical dialectics. First, labor is the perceptual activity, the formation of labor concept and the concept of practice in the perspective of practical philosophy Second, the reality of people and their social relations is the main basis of Marx’s “labor” criticism, labor is precisely the reality of social critical theory, the carrier of history; third, the history of labor activities The essence of transcendence is the realistic solution of instrumental rationality, not the non-labor esthetic setting.