论文部分内容阅读
WTO 争端解决报告的直接效力问题是一个关乎国际组织的裁定在国内执行的重大问题,它不仅涉及到已经通过的 WTO 争端解决报告在国内的执行,而且关系到自然人和法人能否援引相关的报告主张自己的权利,对于国内法院的实践乃至一个国家的司法体制都有重要影响。本文从欧洲法院和欧洲初审法院的司法实践入手,探讨欧共体对于 WTO 争端解决报告直接效力问题的处理和态度,透析其处理方法的内在动因,并简要分析我国参与 WTO 争端解决机制过程中产生的几个问题。
The issue of the direct validity of the WTO dispute settlement report is a major issue concerning the implementation of the ruling of international organizations in the country. It not only concerns the domestic implementation of the WTO dispute settlement report that has been passed, but also whether natural and legal persons can invoke the relevant reports Advocating one’s own rights has an important influence on the practice of domestic courts and on the judicial system of a country. This article starts with the judicial practice of the European Court of First Instance and the European Court of First Instance and discusses the treatment and attitude of the EC on the direct effect of the WTO dispute settlement report. It also analyzes the inherent motivation of its handling methods and briefly analyzes China’s WTO dispute settlement mechanism Several questions.