论文部分内容阅读
2010年11月底,《法制日报》、《经济观察报》、网易财经等多家媒体重点报道了北京问天律师事务所历时半年的调查报告,该报告针对1 447家上市公司股改及其承诺实现情况进行了全面的调查。其中,张远忠律师发布了《关于追究华东医药股份有限公司“非流通股股东”中国远大集团有限责任公司违反股改承诺相关责任人法律责任的公开法律意见书》,在媒体和社会上掀起了轩然大波。关于华东医药大股东是否违反了股改承诺的辩论,引发了人们对股权分置改革的重新思考。随着股改大潮的逐渐落幕,股
By the end of November 2010, a number of media outlets, including Legal Daily, Economic Observer and Netease Financial Group, have focused on the six-month investigation report of Beijing Wentian Law Firm, in connection with the stock reform of 1,447 listed companies and their promises The situation was thoroughly investigated. Among them, Zhang Yuanzhong lawyer issued a “Public Legal Opinion on Investigating Huadong Medicine Co., Ltd. ” non-tradable shareholders “China Grand Group Co., Ltd. breaching the legal responsibility of the persons involved in the share reform commitment”, set off in the media and society Uproar. The debate on whether Huadong Medicine’s major shareholders violated the promises of share reform led to a rethinking of the split share structure reform. With the tide of stock reform coming to an end, shares