司法积极主义和司法消极主义都是一种司法哲学,是在宪政范围内进行的讨论,是对法院政治功能在认识上的针锋相对的主张,两者之争由来已久。参考美国争论不休的现实和借鉴学者对此问题的中立态度,我国应该结合实际,在强调司法能动主义的同时,重视必要的司法克制,实现司法能动和克制的平衡。 Judicial activism and judicial negation are both a kind of judicial philosophy, a discussion held within the framework of constitutionalism, and a long-standing controversy over the recognition of the political function of the courts. With reference to the endless controversy in the United States and using the scholar’s neutral attitude toward this issue, our country should emphasize the necessary judicial restraint and realize the balance of judicial initiative and restraint, while emphasizing judicial activism.