关于中国唐代均田制与租庸調的关系問題,史学界一向存在着不同的看法。自从一九五四年“历史研究”第四期刊登了邓广銘先生所写的“唐代租庸調法研究”一文后,重新引起了国内史学工作者对这个問題的重視,并展开了比較广泛的討論。直接参加討論的,繼邓文之后,在各刊物上还先后發表了岑仲勉先生的“租庸調与均田有無关系”、韓国磐先生的“唐代的均田制与租庸調”、胡如雷先生的“唐代均田制研究”、李必忠先生 As for the relationship between the land leveling system and the renting tone in the Tang Dynasty of China, historians have always had different views. Since the fourth issue of “Historical Studies” in 1954, published by Deng Guangming, the article entitled “Research on Lease and Mediation in the Tang Dynasty” has rekindled the attention of domestic historians to this issue A broader discussion started. Directly participate in the discussion, following Deng Wen, published in various journals also successively published by Mr. Cen Zhong Mian “rent and mediation have no relationship”, Mr. Pan of South Korea “, Mr. Hu Rulei ” Tang Dynasty are field research ", Mr. Li Beizhong