论文部分内容阅读
本刊前一段时期,发现有些来稿存在抄袭现象。编辑,最怕抄袭的文章被采用!然而,借鉴与引用又少不了,如何把握呢?我们在中国视野论坛上发起讨论,受到积极响应。下面选登两位网友的发言,以期引起大家重视。据报刊披露,造假之风这些年在商业领域屡禁不止,三鹿奶粉事件等更是挑战了社会伦理的底线。受此影响,高校存在学风不正、学术浮躁的问题。教育部2002年曾指出,要严肃学术纪律和学术规范,建设优良学风和文风。高校学报要逐步建立一种有效的机制,杜绝关系稿、人情稿,倡导潜心钻研、实事求是、严谨治学的学风,反对学术研究上的急功近利、投机取巧乃至剽窃抄袭的行为,对学术不端行为的认定,《学术规范指南》对学术失范、学术不端、学术腐败三种行为进行了区分。如数据核实不足、文献引用出处注释不全等属于学术失范;抄袭剽窃、篡改他人学术成果、在他人学术成果上署名等属于学术不端;当权者利用学术权力获取名利则属于学术腐败。同样的道理,为评职称、学位而发表论文,目的是要展示您的学识水平,如果是抄袭的文章,岂不是还在愚弄评委吗?
Some period ago, we found some manuscripts exist plagiarism phenomenon. Editing, most afraid of plagiarism articles are adopted! However, drawing on and references and ultimately, how to grasp it? We launched the discussion in the China Vision Forum, by the positive response. The following selected two netizens’ speeches, with a view to arouse our attention. According to the press, the winds of fraud have been repeatedly banned in the commercial field these years, and the Sanlu milk powder incident has even challenged the bottom line of social ethics. Affected by this, colleges and universities exist academic problems, academic impetuous problem. The Ministry of Education pointed out in 2002 that serious academic discipline and academic norms should be established and good academic style and style of writing should be established. Academic journals should gradually establish an effective mechanism to eliminate the relationship draft, the manuscript, advocating painstaking study, seeking truth from facts, rigorous scholarship style of study, academic research against quick success, speculation or plagiarism plagiarism behavior, the recognition of academic misconduct The Guide to Academic Standards made a distinction between the three types of behavior: academic misconduct, academic misconduct, and academic corruption. Such as lack of verification of the data, lack of references cited in the literature are academic anomie; plagiarism, tampering with academic achievements, academic achievements in others academic belong to academic misconduct; the use of academic power to obtain fame and wealth is academic corruption. The same token, for the evaluation title, degree and published a paper, the purpose is to show your level of knowledge, if it is plagiarized article, is it still fool judges?