政学分合与知识生产:清末中国历史教科书编写研究

来源 :安徽史学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:dfly1818
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
教科书编写过程是政府与学界共同制造知识的过程,双方在生产一种“合法”知识过程中充满了文化与政治的矛盾。清末政府希望新教育培养既能维护清朝统治、又能振发国民志气的新式国民。作为学校教育主要载体的中国历史教科书,与政府教育目标有所分合:在振发国民志气方面有相同之处,能够配合政府实现培养新式国民的教育目标;但对“忠君”与维护清朝统治有不同看法,更多反映的是编者对培养新式国民的理解。学者们在编写教科书时,一方面会在某种程度上配合政府的教育目标,一方面又与国家意识形态有所疏离,这使得教科书和政府与学界的期许都有一定的距离,从而影响到通过学校教育而形成的民众知识观念,也蕴含着社会意识演变的多种可能性。 The textbook compilation process is a process of jointly making knowledge between the government and academic circles. Both parties are full of cultural and political contradictions in the process of producing a “legal” knowledge. In the late Qing Dynasty, the government hoped that the new education would cultivate new nationals who can both maintain the rule of the Qing Dynasty and inspire the national aspirations. The Chinese history textbook, which is the main carrier of school education, is divided into the goals of government education: they are similar in striving for the ambition of the nation, and they can cooperate with the government to achieve the education goal of cultivating the new national. However, There are different views on the rule of the Qing Dynasty, and more on the editors’ understanding of cultivating new nationals. Scholars in the preparation of textbooks, on the one hand will be to some extent with the government’s educational goals, on the one hand, and alienated from national ideology, which makes the textbook and the government and academic expectations are to a certain extent, thus affecting The concept of popular knowledge formed through school education also contains many possibilities for the evolution of social consciousness.
其他文献
清中后期,由于固化的财政体制与社会经济发展之间的结构性矛盾,加之统治者应对方策失当与吏治败坏等因素的交互作用,地方亏空不可遏制地蔓延与恶化.官僚系统无法突破既有财政
查阅有关药学文献和报刊杂志,结合临床实际,对各类抗骨质疏松症药物的药理作用与特点、不良反应与注意事项加以概述。抗骨质疏松症的药物有抑制骨吸收和刺激骨形成两类,在临
明代中后期徽州的汪直、徐海等海商集团,横行海上一时。从政府统治和传统观念的立场看,是十恶不赦的“海寇”、“海盗”,但是如果把汪直、徐海等人的作为放到明清时期社会经济变
在撰述旨趣方面,孙甫与范祖禹都希望宋朝的统治集团能以唐为鉴,探讨治乱兴度的原因.但在价值取向方面,孙甫重事功而范祖禹则偏重于儒家伦理道德.对于唐朝致治之本的讨论,孙甫