论文部分内容阅读
目的探析隐裂牙患者应用一次性根管治疗方案与全冠修复治疗方案的疗效及差异性。方法以本院近年来收治隐裂牙患者为本次研究的纳入对象,从中随机抽取100例并根据治疗方案差异分为根管组与全冠修复组,根管组患者接受一次性根管治疗方案,全冠修复组接受全冠修复治疗方案,2组各有患者为50例。对比2组患者临床治疗效果及术后疼痛情况。结果完成治疗后对2组患者疗效进行评价,根管组患者治疗总有效率为92.0%,全冠修复组患者总有效率为94.0%,其疗效对比不具有统计学价值(P>0.05);术后评价2组患者疼痛反应,根管组患者出现疼痛反应1例,全冠修复组患者4例患者发生疼痛反应,差异有统计学价值(P<0.05),经对症处理后均得到缓解。结论对隐裂牙患者无论采取一次性根管治疗或者全冠修复治疗均有令人满意的治疗效果,可行性偏高,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigate the curative effect and the difference of the one-time root canal treatment and the crown restoration treatment in the patients with occlusive tooth. Methods The patients admitted to our hospital in recent years were the subjects of this study. 100 patients were randomly selected and divided into two groups according to the different treatment regimens: root canal group and crown restoration group, and root canal group received one-time root canal therapy Program, the crown repair group received full crown repair treatment program, two groups of patients each with 50 cases. The clinical efficacy and postoperative pain were compared between the two groups. Results After the treatment, the curative effect of the two groups was evaluated. The total effective rate was 92.0% in the root canal group and 94.0% in the crown restoration group. The curative effect was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Postoperative pain response was evaluated in 2 patients, 1 patient in the root canal group, and 4 patients in the crown-covered group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05), and was relieved after symptomatic treatment. Conclusions The patients with latent cracked tooth have satisfactory therapeutic effect both with one-time root canal therapy and full crown repair, which is highly feasible and worthy of clinical promotion.