论文部分内容阅读
把“历史”作为新世界观的解释原则,这既是当代马克思主义哲学研究所取得的重大成果,又是一项需要继续深入探讨的理论课题。在对“历史”的理解中,把握住其内蕴的“实践”与“社会关系”两大范畴的一体化关系是至关重要的,这直接决定了把历史唯物主义与黑格尔、阿尔都塞等人“历史无主体”的思想区别开来,以及把历史唯物主义与“实践唯物主义”解释原则区别开来的基本立足点。而要把握住“实践”与“社会关系”的一体性,首先需要我们返本开新,回到马克思恩格斯对这种一体化关系原始发生的解释——人类学研究当中。
Taking “history” as the principle of interpretation of the new world outlook is not only a significant achievement made by the contemporary study of Marxist philosophy, but also a theoretical topic that needs to be further explored. In the understanding of “history ”, it is very important to grasp the integrative relationship between the two categories of “practice ” and “social relations ”, which directly determines the integration of historical materialism And Hegel, Althusser and other people “history without subject ” thinking, as well as the historical materialism and “practical materialism ” principle of interpretation to distinguish the basic foothold. To grasp the unity of “practice ” and “social relations ”, we first need to start anew and go back to Marx and Engels’ interpretation of the original occurrence of such an integrated relationship - anthropological research.