论文部分内容阅读
《伤寒论》103条(《伤寒论讲义》,成都中医学院主编,1964年版。下引各条同)云:“伤寒中风,有柴胡证,但见一证便是,不必悉具”。仲景立论,意指只要见到柴胡汤证的一个证,而不必强求其他证候全备,便可使用小柴胡汤。然而,仲景没有明确提出但见一证便是究竟是指何证,因而引起历代医家的争议和不同认识。有指小柴胡汤方后或然诸证(《注解伤寒论》成无已);再为口苦、咽干、目眩证(《伤寒后条辨》程郊倩);有单指往
“Treatise on Febrile Diseases” 103 (“Treatise on Febrile Diseases”, chief editor of Chengdu College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1964 edition. All cited below) Yun: “A typhoid-induced stroke has a Chaihu card, but if you see a card, you do not need to know it.” Zhong Jingli’s argument means that Xiaochaihutang can be used as long as he sees one card for the Bupleurum Decoction and does not have to force other cards to be fully prepared. However, Zhongjing did not explicitly put forward but to see a card is exactly what it means. This has caused controversies and different understandings of ancient physicians. Some refer to Xiaochaihutang recipe or afterwards all evidence (“Notes on Treatise on Febrile Diseases” is nothing); again for bitter taste, throat dryness, dizzy evidence (“Treatise on typhoid fever” Cheng Jiaoqian);