在“以人为本”和“公交优先”的大原则下,我们实在有必要提高线网整顿的透明度、延长公示的时间和扩大公示的范围,尽量广征民意,并进行多轮的讨论和论证,将市民的不满情绪化解到最低众所周知,城市常规公共交通曾经过多轮的体制调整。目前,以强调公共服务产品应由市政府统筹办理比较有效为基准,很多城市都重新整顿了近年才逐步开放的市场化的常规公交企业,重新将之国有化。常规公交应该由市场主导还是由政府来统筹?哪个比较有效或是更加符合社会效益?这当然不是本文讨论的要点。这里我们分析一个与此相关的问题,即再次改制后的公交企业涉及的线路重新调整。公交服务企业化后,线路被摊分,产生多家经营的状态。有的是以原有的公交集团为主体,将一部分的线路采用合资的办法,和其他企业成立独立的联合体公司;有的是将公交集团业 Under the principle of “people-oriented” and “bus priority”, it is really necessary for us to improve the transparency of network consolidation, extend the time for public announcement and expand the scope of public announcements. We should try our best to solicit public opinion and conduct many rounds of discussions And argumentation, the dissatisfaction of the public will be resolved to a minimum As we all know, the city routine public transport had many rounds of institutional adjustments. At present, in order to emphasize that public service products should be handled by the municipal government in a more effective manner, many cities have reorganized the market-oriented conventional bus companies that are gradually opening up in recent years and regularized them. Whether the conventional bus should be dominated by the market or by the government? Which is more effective or more social? This is certainly not the point discussed in this article. Here we analyze a related issue, that is, re-restructuring of the bus companies involved in line readjustment. Bus service after the enterprise, the line is spread, resulting in a number of operating status. Some are based on the original bus group as the main part of the line using a joint venture approach, and other companies to set up an independent consortium of companies; some will Bus Group Industry